<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around the Web: Frank the Fanatic Heads to Memphis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.top8magic.com/2008/12/around-the-web-frank-the-fanatic-heads-to-memphis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.top8magic.com/2008/12/around-the-web-frank-the-fanatic-heads-to-memphis/</link>
	<description>Magic: the Gathering current trends, play tips, gossip</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: zsievers</title>
		<link>http://www.top8magic.com/2008/12/around-the-web-frank-the-fanatic-heads-to-memphis/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>zsievers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.top8magic.com/?p=1132#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how he complies the information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how he complies the information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.top8magic.com/2008/12/around-the-web-frank-the-fanatic-heads-to-memphis/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.top8magic.com/?p=1132#comment-321</guid>
		<description>That's a cool idea I suppose, but I don't think the list he wound up with is very good. He's obviously an excellent player, so it's probably fine anyway, but still. I think that the real problem with this approach is that there ultimately isn't that much data [from a statistical perspective], so it isn't clear that averages should be trusted for such minute decisions as 1x Ponder. While 82 lists isn't nothing, there isn't any real statistical validity to it. Just like testing 10 game sets, you really have to go with the feel of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a cool idea I suppose, but I don&#8217;t think the list he wound up with is very good. He&#8217;s obviously an excellent player, so it&#8217;s probably fine anyway, but still. I think that the real problem with this approach is that there ultimately isn&#8217;t that much data [from a statistical perspective], so it isn&#8217;t clear that averages should be trusted for such minute decisions as 1x Ponder. While 82 lists isn&#8217;t nothing, there isn&#8217;t any real statistical validity to it. Just like testing 10 game sets, you really have to go with the feel of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

