<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast: Rules Changes! 6/12 Part 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.top8magic.com/2009/06/podcast-rules-changes-612-part-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.top8magic.com/2009/06/podcast-rules-changes-612-part-7/</link>
	<description>Magic: the Gathering current trends, play tips, gossip</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: K-Staks</title>
		<link>http://www.top8magic.com/2009/06/podcast-rules-changes-612-part-7/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>K-Staks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.top8magic.com/?p=1667#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>I don't know for sure, but I think the guy named will, I constantly found it very annoying everytime he would derail the conversation. It was almost like the other 3 guys were babysitting him and trying to get him to be quiet. Other than that guy, It was an interesting podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know for sure, but I think the guy named will, I constantly found it very annoying everytime he would derail the conversation. It was almost like the other 3 guys were babysitting him and trying to get him to be quiet. Other than that guy, It was an interesting podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glitch</title>
		<link>http://www.top8magic.com/2009/06/podcast-rules-changes-612-part-7/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Glitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.top8magic.com/?p=1667#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>Concerning First Defender
Wrong. This isn't new design space. You easily could have designed this card in the old rules with assigning damage

First Defender (In combat, Lethal damage must be assigned to ~ before it can be assigned to other creatures blocking or blocked with ~)

They could probably word it better, but it can easily be done. Also, I will agree that changing blocking order isn't interesting design space. Most of the time, those spells will just be dead cards, since double blocking doesn't come up that often, and when it does, it will almost always be worse than just packing removal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning First Defender<br />
Wrong. This isn&#8217;t new design space. You easily could have designed this card in the old rules with assigning damage</p>
<p>First Defender (In combat, Lethal damage must be assigned to ~ before it can be assigned to other creatures blocking or blocked with ~)</p>
<p>They could probably word it better, but it can easily be done. Also, I will agree that changing blocking order isn&#8217;t interesting design space. Most of the time, those spells will just be dead cards, since double blocking doesn&#8217;t come up that often, and when it does, it will almost always be worse than just packing removal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

