Comments on: Happy New Year, Upcoming New Projects and How are you enjoying My Files Part 1? http://www.top8magic.com/2010/01/happy-new-year-upcoming-new-projects-and-how-are-you-enjoying-my-files-part-1/ Magic: the Gathering current trends, play tips, gossip Fri, 18 May 2012 01:16:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: ProdigalT http://www.top8magic.com/2010/01/happy-new-year-upcoming-new-projects-and-how-are-you-enjoying-my-files-part-1/#comment-1828 ProdigalT Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:52:00 +0000 http://www.top8magic.com/?p=2016#comment-1828 Missing some classics such as (I think) "you're not going to Japan." I understand there will be another edition, but it would make more sense to just get everything in chronological order rather than have gaps in this book and then another book to fill in those gaps. Missing some classics such as (I think) “you’re not going to Japan.” I understand there will be another edition, but it would make more sense to just get everything in chronological order rather than have gaps in this book and then another book to fill in those gaps.

]]> By: Morley http://www.top8magic.com/2010/01/happy-new-year-upcoming-new-projects-and-how-are-you-enjoying-my-files-part-1/#comment-1820 Morley Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:50:34 +0000 http://www.top8magic.com/?p=2016#comment-1820 I got my copy of MF1 before the holidays and am working my way through it. It's a great walk down memory lane. It's hard to say anything new about it since they're all old articles, but: (1) The new commentary is great. I like that Zvi's talking about writerly stuff, and I'm hoping for more of that (in addition to whether the article's ideas still fly.) (2) There are a lot spelling errors and mistyped card names (which if I recall were carried over from the source material). Given the age of the material, I suppose it's not that surprising. If there were a way to community-proof the text, I'd be down for that, but it's not a huge deal. I got my copy of MF1 before the holidays and am working my way through it. It’s a great walk down memory lane. It’s hard to say anything new about it since they’re all old articles, but:

(1) The new commentary is great. I like that Zvi’s talking about writerly stuff, and I’m hoping for more of that (in addition to whether the article’s ideas still fly.)

(2) There are a lot spelling errors and mistyped card names (which if I recall were carried over from the source material). Given the age of the material, I suppose it’s not that surprising. If there were a way to community-proof the text, I’d be down for that, but it’s not a huge deal.

]]>